<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Google results are about to get weirder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2009/12/17/your-google-results-are-about-to-get-weirder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2009/12/17/your-google-results-are-about-to-get-weirder/</link>
	<description>News and views on search tools and electronic resources for business information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:17:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: December &#171; Dee&#39;tjes</title>
		<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2009/12/17/your-google-results-are-about-to-get-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-4926</link>
		<dc:creator>December &#171; Dee&#39;tjes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 14:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/?p=889#comment-4926</guid>
		<description>[...] Met de personalised search is niet iedereen blij:  Google Now Personalizes Everyone’s Search Results This &#8220;service&#8221; is OPT-OUT not opt-in en Google’s Personalized Results: The “New Normal” That Deserves Extraordinary Attention  Normal search = dead . Karen Blakeman zegt zelfs: Your Google results are about to get weirder. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Met de personalised search is niet iedereen blij:  Google Now Personalizes Everyone’s Search Results This &#8220;service&#8221; is OPT-OUT not opt-in en Google’s Personalized Results: The “New Normal” That Deserves Extraordinary Attention  Normal search = dead . Karen Blakeman zegt zelfs: Your Google results are about to get weirder. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Blakeman</title>
		<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2009/12/17/your-google-results-are-about-to-get-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-4866</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Blakeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/?p=889#comment-4866</guid>
		<description>Actually its now 4-5/10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually its now 4-5/10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Blakeman</title>
		<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2009/12/17/your-google-results-are-about-to-get-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-4865</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Blakeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/?p=889#comment-4865</guid>
		<description>Hi, And a Merry Christmas to you. 

For those of us who do training on internet search strategies, this is going to be a nightmare. I used to have one slide explaining why you can get different results from one moment to the next, now have two. I&#039;m expecting to have to add a third! And of course people sitting next to one another in the workshop compare the results for their searches. At least it will demonstrate the extreme variability of Google results.

As for analytics, finding out who is visiting your pages and how they got there is a black art. I had a sudden huge spike in my blog stats a few weeks ago. I was about to investigate when I spotted that Roddy Macleod who produces the Internet Resources Newsletter is retiring and I got a special mention in despatches; people were clicking the link he gave to my blog.

Sigh... and now it&#039;s snowing again - about 3/10 in RG4 but at least not as bad as in Yorkshire and Manchester.

Karen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, And a Merry Christmas to you. </p>
<p>For those of us who do training on internet search strategies, this is going to be a nightmare. I used to have one slide explaining why you can get different results from one moment to the next, now have two. I&#8217;m expecting to have to add a third! And of course people sitting next to one another in the workshop compare the results for their searches. At least it will demonstrate the extreme variability of Google results.</p>
<p>As for analytics, finding out who is visiting your pages and how they got there is a black art. I had a sudden huge spike in my blog stats a few weeks ago. I was about to investigate when I spotted that Roddy Macleod who produces the Internet Resources Newsletter is retiring and I got a special mention in despatches; people were clicking the link he gave to my blog.</p>
<p>Sigh&#8230; and now it&#8217;s snowing again &#8211; about 3/10 in RG4 but at least not as bad as in Yorkshire and Manchester.</p>
<p>Karen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Property blog</title>
		<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2009/12/17/your-google-results-are-about-to-get-weirder/comment-page-1/#comment-4864</link>
		<dc:creator>Property blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/?p=889#comment-4864</guid>
		<description>Hi Karen and Merry Christmas to you.

This will have a big impact on SEO companies for sure.

How can you check what and where you rank for easily.

The caffeine update which is due i believe over christmas will provide new results again. The days are gone where everybody sees the same and trying to reproduce results is defiantely probematic. 

There was a month where we were getting great traffic for the search &#039;writer&#039;. How and where ?? who knows ?? could never reproduce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Karen and Merry Christmas to you.</p>
<p>This will have a big impact on SEO companies for sure.</p>
<p>How can you check what and where you rank for easily.</p>
<p>The caffeine update which is due i believe over christmas will provide new results again. The days are gone where everybody sees the same and trying to reproduce results is defiantely probematic. </p>
<p>There was a month where we were getting great traffic for the search &#8216;writer&#8217;. How and where ?? who knows ?? could never reproduce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
