<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wolfram Alpha is out &#8211; hmmm&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2009/05/16/wolfram-alpha-is-out-hmmm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2009/05/16/wolfram-alpha-is-out-hmmm/</link>
	<description>News and views on search tools and Internet resources for business information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:14:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google bibliotheken en twitter overzicht mei 2009 &#171; Dee&#8217;tjes</title>
		<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2009/05/16/wolfram-alpha-is-out-hmmm/comment-page-1/#comment-4044</link>
		<dc:creator>Google bibliotheken en twitter overzicht mei 2009 &#171; Dee&#8217;tjes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 19:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/?p=627#comment-4044</guid>
		<description>[...] Ook veel commotie over Wolfram Alpha: mij viel het niet mee trouwens, ik kan er net als Karen Blakeman, niet goed tegen als ik niet weet van wie de info komt. En garanderen dat die bronnen betrouwbaar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ook veel commotie over Wolfram Alpha: mij viel het niet mee trouwens, ik kan er net als Karen Blakeman, niet goed tegen als ik niet weet van wie de info komt. En garanderen dat die bronnen betrouwbaar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VocabControl &#187; BBC NEWS &#124; Wolfram Alpha &#8216;as important as Google&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2009/05/16/wolfram-alpha-is-out-hmmm/comment-page-1/#comment-4019</link>
		<dc:creator>VocabControl &#187; BBC NEWS &#124; Wolfram Alpha &#8216;as important as Google&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 18:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/?p=627#comment-4019</guid>
		<description>[...] Karen Blakeman’s Blog » Blog Archive » Wolfram Alpha is out - hmmm… [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Karen Blakeman’s Blog » Blog Archive » Wolfram Alpha is out &#8211; hmmm… [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Something new &#8211; WolframAlpha &#171; spineless?</title>
		<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2009/05/16/wolfram-alpha-is-out-hmmm/comment-page-1/#comment-4002</link>
		<dc:creator>Something new &#8211; WolframAlpha &#171; spineless?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 10:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/?p=627#comment-4002</guid>
		<description>[...] See real time tweets about the new service, and for a brief review of it, read what Karen Blakeman writes on her blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See real time tweets about the new service, and for a brief review of it, read what Karen Blakeman writes on her blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2009/05/16/wolfram-alpha-is-out-hmmm/comment-page-1/#comment-3995</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 15:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/?p=627#comment-3995</guid>
		<description>Nice read you have there! Obviously working on a search engine myself I do have bias towards new engines, but for the hype I don&#039;t think WA really shocked me. I agree about sources not being linked to. To me if I was to do research and then place WA as the source I think it would raise quite a few eyebrows. I think however WA has attempted to do something different, and I&#039;m sure it&#039;s a push for Google &amp; other engines.

 I know for a fact that MSE360 will now try harder to really provide out of the box data like WA (and to a lesser extent Google) does. It&#039;s not as early days as WA would like you to think, I mean they have had years creating this project and many before that working on their software range, I think it&#039;s becoming an excuse to easily. MSE360 is 6 months old, 7 is you count the first month of programming. WA tried to hype itself too much, and then just before launch they tried to kill that hype.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice read you have there! Obviously working on a search engine myself I do have bias towards new engines, but for the hype I don&#8217;t think WA really shocked me. I agree about sources not being linked to. To me if I was to do research and then place WA as the source I think it would raise quite a few eyebrows. I think however WA has attempted to do something different, and I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s a push for Google &amp; other engines.</p>
<p> I know for a fact that MSE360 will now try harder to really provide out of the box data like WA (and to a lesser extent Google) does. It&#8217;s not as early days as WA would like you to think, I mean they have had years creating this project and many before that working on their software range, I think it&#8217;s becoming an excuse to easily. MSE360 is 6 months old, 7 is you count the first month of programming. WA tried to hype itself too much, and then just before launch they tried to kill that hype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
