<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitterplan &#8211; UK local government mashup for planning applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2009/04/24/twitterplan-uk-local-government-mashup-for-planning-applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2009/04/24/twitterplan-uk-local-government-mashup-for-planning-applications/</link>
	<description>News and comments on search tools and electronic resources for business information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 02:28:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Blakeman</title>
		<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2009/04/24/twitterplan-uk-local-government-mashup-for-planning-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-4074</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Blakeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 05:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/?p=600#comment-4074</guid>
		<description>That surprises me as well. I had a message from one of the developers of Twitterplan explaining that they are using the data gathered for the email alert version at http://www.planningalerts.com/, which in turn is &quot;scraped&quot; from the council web sites. So the councils do not really have to do anything to be involved. Perhaps there are technical issues that prevent the Edinburgh data being gathered in this way or maybe they did not give their permission?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That surprises me as well. I had a message from one of the developers of Twitterplan explaining that they are using the data gathered for the email alert version at <a href="http://www.planningalerts.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.planningalerts.com/</a>, which in turn is &#8220;scraped&#8221; from the council web sites. So the councils do not really have to do anything to be involved. Perhaps there are technical issues that prevent the Edinburgh data being gathered in this way or maybe they did not give their permission?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architect in Edinburgh</title>
		<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2009/04/24/twitterplan-uk-local-government-mashup-for-planning-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-4071</link>
		<dc:creator>Architect in Edinburgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/?p=600#comment-4071</guid>
		<description>Disappointed that Edinburgh Council do not partake, their web presence is very good. Surprised that Fife council do however, I have a lot of clients there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disappointed that Edinburgh Council do not partake, their web presence is very good. Surprised that Fife council do however, I have a lot of clients there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

