<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ZoomInfo fails to address quality issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2007/04/07/zoominfo-fails-to-address-quality-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2007/04/07/zoominfo-fails-to-address-quality-issues/</link>
	<description>News and views on search tools and Internet resources for business information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:14:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Theiss</title>
		<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2007/04/07/zoominfo-fails-to-address-quality-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-889</link>
		<dc:creator>John Theiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2007/04/07/zoominfo-fails-to-address-quality-issues/#comment-889</guid>
		<description>My profile on ZoomInfo is from a single source. The profile drops a critical sentence from the source and adds information about a mental illness I do not have and a place I do not live, which is not on the source web site. The site won&#039;t let me edit the material without a credit card number. In other words, there is no reasonable way I can fix libelous information they are publishing about me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My profile on ZoomInfo is from a single source. The profile drops a critical sentence from the source and adds information about a mental illness I do not have and a place I do not live, which is not on the source web site. The site won&#8217;t let me edit the material without a credit card number. In other words, there is no reasonable way I can fix libelous information they are publishing about me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yulia Goldshteyn</title>
		<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2007/04/07/zoominfo-fails-to-address-quality-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-761</link>
		<dc:creator>Yulia Goldshteyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 15:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2007/04/07/zoominfo-fails-to-address-quality-issues/#comment-761</guid>
		<description>I run a small ecommerce site. I never publish my personal information on my website. To my surprise, my company profile on Zoominfo contained very private and personal information. Where did they get it? 

I have no interest of becoming a member. However, it was the only option to correct or modify the information. 

Zoominfo needs to be more responsible of that information they gather and publish since they do it without people’s awareness and approval. If they recognize a quality issue, they need to error proof it until effective corrective actions are in place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I run a small ecommerce site. I never publish my personal information on my website. To my surprise, my company profile on Zoominfo contained very private and personal information. Where did they get it? </p>
<p>I have no interest of becoming a member. However, it was the only option to correct or modify the information. </p>
<p>Zoominfo needs to be more responsible of that information they gather and publish since they do it without people’s awareness and approval. If they recognize a quality issue, they need to error proof it until effective corrective actions are in place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Blakeman</title>
		<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2007/04/07/zoominfo-fails-to-address-quality-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Blakeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 07:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2007/04/07/zoominfo-fails-to-address-quality-issues/#comment-749</guid>
		<description>Russell, thanks for your response and comments. Regarding the options for editing a profile, I could not find a free way of doing it in the previous interface to Zoominfo but did find it in the new version. I guess I was looking in the wrong place. The new interface certainly makes it easier to narrow down the search and to correct inaccuracies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russell, thanks for your response and comments. Regarding the options for editing a profile, I could not find a free way of doing it in the previous interface to Zoominfo but did find it in the new version. I guess I was looking in the wrong place. The new interface certainly makes it easier to narrow down the search and to correct inaccuracies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Glass</title>
		<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2007/04/07/zoominfo-fails-to-address-quality-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Glass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2007/04/07/zoominfo-fails-to-address-quality-issues/#comment-724</guid>
		<description>Karen, thanks for your post.  I read your blog fairly regularly and think you have a great understanding of the space.  As the VP of products and marketing at ZoomInfo, I take your comments and those of others seriously.  I want to give you an idea of why so many large companies (over 1600) pay us for our service, as well as clear up a few misconceptions that your readers may have.

First of all, we don&#039;t charge anybody to edit or update their profile.  That is a free service, and we believe that we&#039;re providing people a real benefit by collecting all the references about them on the web, and allowing them to control their web presence by having an up-to-date ZoomInfo profile that shows up highly ranked in Google search results.  All for free.

Secondly, our customers that do pay for our service all recognize that the data we compile has inaccuracies -- just like any other large data-set.  In fact, in very clear view, we tell our users &quot;This profile was automatically generated using information found on the Internet. This information has not been verified.&quot;  However, the real value we deliver to them is the ability to make connections and find information that they never would have found without ZoomInfo.  Our semantic search engine is able to make connections and associations that allows a user to, say, search for managing directors, located in the UK, in finance, with experience in healthcare.  This kind of search could never be done in Google, Hoovers, or any other dataset without huge teams of researchers to cull through and summarize the data.  This is where the real value is: finding information about businesses and people that can&#039;t be found anywhere else. 

The good news for those that do require higher levels of accuracy is that we are launching significant improvements to our algorithms in the coming months.  To start, we&#039;ll be improving our refresh rate to daily.  This will deliver a much fresher dataset (and thus more accurate since as you know accuracy is a function of time).  Since the internet is constantly updated by the various stakeholders looking to get their information out there, we believe it is the freshest source of data in the world, and ZoomInfo will now bring this freshness to our users.  As a next step, we are going to be releasing significant improvements to the core data itself, which will further improve the experience for our users.

In the end, we want to be the largest, most accurate, most &quot;searchable,&quot; and most up-to-date source of business information on the planet.  We&#039;re not there yet, but we are able to deliver significant value today for a lot of users, and I think we&#039;ll get there soon.  We&#039;re certainly trying hard! 

Thanks again for your post and to your readers for their comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karen, thanks for your post.  I read your blog fairly regularly and think you have a great understanding of the space.  As the VP of products and marketing at ZoomInfo, I take your comments and those of others seriously.  I want to give you an idea of why so many large companies (over 1600) pay us for our service, as well as clear up a few misconceptions that your readers may have.</p>
<p>First of all, we don&#8217;t charge anybody to edit or update their profile.  That is a free service, and we believe that we&#8217;re providing people a real benefit by collecting all the references about them on the web, and allowing them to control their web presence by having an up-to-date ZoomInfo profile that shows up highly ranked in Google search results.  All for free.</p>
<p>Secondly, our customers that do pay for our service all recognize that the data we compile has inaccuracies &#8212; just like any other large data-set.  In fact, in very clear view, we tell our users &#8220;This profile was automatically generated using information found on the Internet. This information has not been verified.&#8221;  However, the real value we deliver to them is the ability to make connections and find information that they never would have found without ZoomInfo.  Our semantic search engine is able to make connections and associations that allows a user to, say, search for managing directors, located in the UK, in finance, with experience in healthcare.  This kind of search could never be done in Google, Hoovers, or any other dataset without huge teams of researchers to cull through and summarize the data.  This is where the real value is: finding information about businesses and people that can&#8217;t be found anywhere else. </p>
<p>The good news for those that do require higher levels of accuracy is that we are launching significant improvements to our algorithms in the coming months.  To start, we&#8217;ll be improving our refresh rate to daily.  This will deliver a much fresher dataset (and thus more accurate since as you know accuracy is a function of time).  Since the internet is constantly updated by the various stakeholders looking to get their information out there, we believe it is the freshest source of data in the world, and ZoomInfo will now bring this freshness to our users.  As a next step, we are going to be releasing significant improvements to the core data itself, which will further improve the experience for our users.</p>
<p>In the end, we want to be the largest, most accurate, most &#8220;searchable,&#8221; and most up-to-date source of business information on the planet.  We&#8217;re not there yet, but we are able to deliver significant value today for a lot of users, and I think we&#8217;ll get there soon.  We&#8217;re certainly trying hard! </p>
<p>Thanks again for your post and to your readers for their comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Kernaghan</title>
		<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2007/04/07/zoominfo-fails-to-address-quality-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Kernaghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2007/04/07/zoominfo-fails-to-address-quality-issues/#comment-722</guid>
		<description>I had the same experience - incorrect listings that actually listed me and other colleague working for a competitive organization.

Obnoxious is right - paying to fix incorrect listings that we didn&#039;t ask for is irresponsible and very irritating.  I am surprised that many people will see their incorrect listings for free and still be willing to pay to access other listings that are probably just as incorrect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same experience &#8211; incorrect listings that actually listed me and other colleague working for a competitive organization.</p>
<p>Obnoxious is right &#8211; paying to fix incorrect listings that we didn&#8217;t ask for is irresponsible and very irritating.  I am surprised that many people will see their incorrect listings for free and still be willing to pay to access other listings that are probably just as incorrect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Fahrion</title>
		<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2007/04/07/zoominfo-fails-to-address-quality-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Fahrion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2007/04/07/zoominfo-fails-to-address-quality-issues/#comment-719</guid>
		<description>Targeted searches like this are becoming an emerging market. Personally, I find ZoomInfo&#039;s business strategy really obnoxious: &quot;Hi we&#039;re hosting this incorrect profile of you! Do you want to pay to fix it?&quot;

What&#039;s really annoying is that they are somehow managing to get high up in the Google results too. A google search for my own name pulls them up on the first page. 

Nice content niche you&#039;ve carved out here by the way. Good writing too. I quoted you and I ranted a bit about ZoomInfo as part of a post I did about &lt;a href=&quot;http://catcubed.com/2007/04/10/hey-wait-this-is-public/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;potential employers searching your name as part of the hiring practice.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Targeted searches like this are becoming an emerging market. Personally, I find ZoomInfo&#8217;s business strategy really obnoxious: &#8220;Hi we&#8217;re hosting this incorrect profile of you! Do you want to pay to fix it?&#8221;</p>
<p>What&#8217;s really annoying is that they are somehow managing to get high up in the Google results too. A google search for my own name pulls them up on the first page. </p>
<p>Nice content niche you&#8217;ve carved out here by the way. Good writing too. I quoted you and I ranted a bit about ZoomInfo as part of a post I did about <a href="http://catcubed.com/2007/04/10/hey-wait-this-is-public/" rel="nofollow">potential employers searching your name as part of the hiring practice.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CatCubed : Blog Archive &#187; Hey wait this is public!?!</title>
		<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2007/04/07/zoominfo-fails-to-address-quality-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>CatCubed : Blog Archive &#187; Hey wait this is public!?!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2007/04/07/zoominfo-fails-to-address-quality-issues/#comment-718</guid>
		<description>[...] of Karen Blakeman&#8217;s Blog&#8212;who obviously believes in blogging under your real name&#8212;wrote that she couldn&#8217;t &#8220;find any redeeming features that would persuade [her] to pay money [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Karen Blakeman&#8217;s Blog&mdash;who obviously believes in blogging under your real name&mdash;wrote that she couldn&#8217;t &#8220;find any redeeming features that would persuade [her] to pay money [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shashank Garg</title>
		<link>http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2007/04/07/zoominfo-fails-to-address-quality-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Shashank Garg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rba.co.uk/wordpress/2007/04/07/zoominfo-fails-to-address-quality-issues/#comment-717</guid>
		<description>I think Data Quality is common problem with huge data sources including privately maintained data in blue chip companies. The only option seems to be a tool showing inconsistencies, incorrectness and incompleteness among other systems i.e if we have Zoominfo then we may look into LinkedIn as well to see consistency, correctness and completeness  - I dont think any other resonable solution..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Data Quality is common problem with huge data sources including privately maintained data in blue chip companies. The only option seems to be a tool showing inconsistencies, incorrectness and incompleteness among other systems i.e if we have Zoominfo then we may look into LinkedIn as well to see consistency, correctness and completeness  &#8211; I dont think any other resonable solution..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
